Peta must have a high school kid doing their print design. This is the worse blending I have ever seen for a professional company. Also, Peta never got the permission from any of these people to put them in the ad. Can we say lawsuit? I sure hope so, and not because the people in it would be greedy, but this terrible print design needs to be stopped. I hope you ever designed this ad will be fired. They could always call me and pay me to design an ad. I would be more than happy for the extra income. At least I have a degree and experience with print design.
The White House has found out about the ad, and now the White House has had this to say:
The White House is fuming over a new anti-fur ad featuring first lady Michelle Obama.
She appears alongside Oprah Winfrey, Carrie Underwood and Tyra Banks — who have all refused to wear real fur — in “Fur-Free and Fabulous,” PETA’s new ad campaign, which was unveiled last week and can be seen at Washington, D.C.-area Metro stations and on the group’s website.
But the White House maintains that PETA had no right to use the image of the first lady in its new ads.
PETA president Ingrid Newkirk insists her organization wouldn’t have sought Obama’s consent for the ad because it knows that she can’t make such an endorsement.
“The fact is that Michelle Obama has issued a statement indicating that she doesn’t wear fur, and the world should know that in PETA’s eyes, that makes her pretty fabulous,” she said in a press statement.
PETA senior vice president Dan Mathews added that Obama should be flattered. Introducing the campaign, he said: “By rejecting fur, these style icons demonstrate to the world that fur is old-fashioned and cruel.”
Leave a Reply